Hi kgoo, thanks for report. At first sight it looks like problem with boundary description. We use relation 2177258. The problem is probably related to line "Relation Nouvelle-Calédonie (1628087) as land_area" - the process maybe cuts out the bridges :(. Moreover the boundary is not valid now, so some older backup was used (for November data), but I have seen the problem also in older data. regards Martin
Hi kgoo, it should be fixed now (and recomputed data are available on Early Maps Access). I still do not like original relation 2177258 - it contains mentioned "land_area" relation (1628087), two nodes, and Relation Récifs de Bellone (3225953) without "role" description ... so I am not sure if even on OSM side it is correct. regards Martin